Praxys engineering progress

We added a workflow for creating a design brief before implementation, covering typography, color, and layout direction. The workflow is evaluated with preview projects rather than offered as a public guarantee.

Editor work added a way to anchor a requested change to an element in a preview. It is implementation progress, not a promise that every preview environment exposes the feature.

We continued work on an editor for reviewing and making code changes alongside AI-assisted work. Access and supported collaboration flows are confirmed per project.

Collaboration implementation covers shared project editing and change reconciliation. It remains part of the evolving preview workflow, not a public availability commitment.

We implemented foundations for sharing a preview. Access control, deployment, and availability are confirmed for each preview project.

We expanded adapter conformance coverage. Coverage and supported providers vary by adapter, so an implementation record is not a production-support claim.

We continued implementation of authorization controls and review surfaces. Teams remain responsible for their own authorization decisions and testing.

We continued account-security implementation and review work during the preview period.

We validated a prompt-to-generated-app demo path, including a sandbox payment flow. This is engineering evidence, not a public deployment or payment-service promise.

We implemented and tested live-preview development work. Actual preview behavior and performance depend on the project environment.

We expanded the schemas, migrations, and data-layer foundations used by generated applications. A project’s data model remains subject to design and review.

We expanded implementation across payments, tax, messaging, shipping, and other domains. Provider availability is confirmed project by project.

We worked on persisted project state and versioning foundations. Retention, recovery, and export behavior are not yet public service commitments.

We developed isolation and tenant-aware runtime controls. The active controls and deployment boundary depend on the supported preview environment.

We built foundations for starting a project from a prompt and exploring templates. Public self-serve access is not available.

We defined the product direction for a system that turns a brief into a reviewable application change. The scope continues to be tested in controlled preview.

We documented the intended journey from first prompt through review and deployment work. A roadmap is not a delivery date or availability guarantee.

We designed the application, tenancy, security, and platform architecture before broad product rollout. Implementation and operational support remain separate questions.

We began the shared packages for data, service communication, observability, and security. These packages support the platform; they do not by themselves establish a public service level.

We added automated engineering checks to catch avoidable failures. They complement, rather than guarantee, human review and product validation.